@include '/var/www/htdocs-sw/layout.inc'; ?>
Earlier (a year or two ago) I e-mailed sharedweight a question or comment about squares. It never got sent around. At the time, I figured someone was filtering the various e-mails and wanted to make sure the discussion was geared only towards contra. Fine. Now I see that others can send questions etc. about squares. Am I being treated any differently than other people who are signed up for sharedweight? When I recieve an e-mail from sharedweight, the question and the answers are in the same e-mail!!! It must be that the others get to see the question and then answer it before I get to see the question. Am I left out of the loop -like you're afraid that I'm always going to jump in with my 2 cents (maybe because I'm an experienced caller). If this is the case, I just want you to know that I rarely want to respond to the questions and requests. I also realize that it's very important for the new callers to voice their opinion and have a discussion. Am I being treated differently from the others? Tom On Jan 20, 2010, at 12:00 PM, callers-request at sharedweight.net wrote: > Send Callers mailing list submissions to > callers at sharedweight.net > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > http://www.sharedweight.net/mailman/listinfo/callers > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > callers-request at sharedweight.net > > You can reach the person managing the list at > callers-owner at sharedweight.net > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of Callers digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. Re: squares for house parties of mostly contra dancers? > (gtwood at worldpath.net) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2010 16:05:26 -0500 > From: <gtwood at worldpath.net> > To: callers at sharedweight.net > Subject: Re: [Callers] squares for house parties of mostly contra > dancers? > Message-ID: <RZ88iPEv.1263935126.1308590.gtwood at worldpath.net> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 > > > All this talk of Squares, and with Ralph Page weekend and all > reminded me that I found this on the web: > for all you Rabbit fans: > (we should always listen to the caller!) > the scene: 2 mountain gents trying to get the best of Bugs > of course Bugs turns the tables..... > > Bugs Bunnys Square > > Promenade across the floor. Sashay right on out the door. > Out the door and into the glade and everybody promenade. > Step right up you're doing fine. > I'll pull your beard you'll pull mine. > Yank it again like you did before. > Break it up with a tug of war. > Now into the brook and fish for the trout. > Dive right in and splash about. Trout! Trout! Pretty little trout! > One more splash and come right out. > Shake like a hound-dog. Shake again. > Wallow around in the old pig pen. > Wallow some more. Y'all know how. > Roll around like an old fat sow. > Allemande left with your right hand. > Follow through with a great left band. (?) > Now lead your partner the dirty old thing. > Follow through with an elbow swing. > Grab a fence post. Hold it tight. > Womp your partner with all your might. > Hit him in the shin. Hit him in the head. > Hit him again. The critter ain't dead. > Womp him low and womp him high. > Stick your finger in his eye. > Pretty little ring. Pretty little sound. Bang your heads against the > ground. > Promenade all around the room. Promenade like a bride and groom. > Open up the door and step right in. > Close the door and into a spin. Whirl! Whirl! Twist and twirl! > Jump all around like a flying squirrel. > Now don't you fuss and don't you swear. > Just come right out and form a square. > Now right hand over and left hand under. > Both join hands and run like thunder. > Over the hill and over the dale. > Duck your head and lift your tail. > Don't you stray and don't you roam. > Turn to your partner. Promenade home. > Corn in the cornfield. Wheat in the sack. Turn to your partner. > Promenade > back. > And now you're home. Bow to your partner. > Bow to the gent across the hall. And that is all! > > On 1/19/2010, "Jeff Kaufman" <jeff at alum.swarthmore.edu> wrote: > >> >> We ended up doing melanie's triplet (twice) and ladies star. There >> turned out to be several non-dancer people so I gave up on the >> "no-walkthrough" goal. The dances went pretty well; thanks! >> >> Jeff >> >> >> >> >> > > > ------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > Callers mailing list > Callers at sharedweight.net > http://www.sharedweight.net/mailman/listinfo/callers > > > End of Callers Digest, Vol 65, Issue 14 > ***************************************